Investopedia contributors come from a range of backgrounds, and over 25 years there have been thousands of expert writers and editors who have contributed.
Updated June 04, 2024 Reviewed by Reviewed by Gordon ScottGordon Scott has been an active investor and technical analyst or 20+ years. He is a Chartered Market Technician (CMT).
Fact checked by Fact checked by Yarilet PerezYarilet Perez is an experienced multimedia journalist and fact-checker with a Master of Science in Journalism. She has worked in multiple cities covering breaking news, politics, education, and more. Her expertise is in personal finance and investing, and real estate.
A free trade agreement is a pact between two or more nations to reduce barriers to imports and exports among them. Under a free trade policy, goods and services can be bought and sold across international borders with little or no government tariffs, quotas, subsidies, or prohibitions to inhibit their exchange.
The concept of free trade is the opposite of trade protectionism or economic isolationism.
In the modern world, free trade policy is often implemented by means of a formal and mutual agreement of the nations involved. However, a free-trade policy may simply be the absence of any trade restrictions.
A government doesn't need to take specific action to promote free trade. This hands-off stance is referred to as “laissez-faire trade” or trade liberalization.
Governments with free-trade policies or agreements in place do not necessarily abandon all control of imports and exports or eliminate all protectionist policies. In modern international trade, few free trade agreements (FTAs) result in completely free trade.
The benefits of free trade were outlined in "On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation," published by economist David Ricardo in 1817.
For example, a nation might allow free trade with another nation, with exceptions that forbid the import of specific drugs not approved by its regulators, animals that have not been vaccinated, or processed foods that do not meet its standards.
It might also have policies in place that exempt specific products from tariff-free status in order to protect home producers from foreign competition in their industries.
In principle, free trade on the international level is no different from trade between neighbors, towns, or states.
However, it allows businesses in each country to focus on producing and selling the goods that best use their resources while other businesses import goods that are scarce or unavailable domestically. That mix of local production and foreign trade allows countries to experience faster growth while better meeting the needs of their consumers.
This view was first popularized in 1817 by economist David Ricardo in his book, "On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation." He argued that free trade expands the diversity and lowers the prices of goods available in a nation while better exploiting its homegrown resources, knowledge, and specialized skills.
Prior to the 1800s, global trade was dominated by the theory of mercantilism. This theory placed priority on having a favorable balance of trade relative to other countries and accumulating more gold and silver.
In order to attain a favorable balance of trade, countries would often place trade barriers like taxes and tariffs to discourage their residents from purchasing foreign goods. This incentivized consumers to purchase locally-made products, thereby supporting domestic industries.
Ricardo introduced the law of comparative advantage, which states that countries can attain the maximum benefits through free trade. Ricardo demonstrated that if countries prioritize producing the goods that they can produce more cheaply than other countries (i.e., where they have a comparative advantage) they will be able to produce more goods in total than they would by limiting trade.
Free trade has allowed many countries to attain rapid economic growth. By focusing on exports and resources where they have a strong comparative advantage, many countries have been able to attract foreign investment capital and provide relatively high-paying jobs for local workers.
For consumers, free trade creates a competitive environment where countries strive to provide the lowest possible prices for their resources. This in turn allows manufacturers to provide lower prices for finished goods, ultimately increasing the buying power for all consumers.
However, there are economic losers when a country opens its borders to free trade. Domestic industries may be unable to compete with foreign competitors, causing local unemployment. Large-scale industries may move to countries with lax environmental and labor laws, resulting in child labor or pollution.
Free trade can also make countries more dependent on the global market. For example, while the prices of some goods may be lower in the world market, there are strategic benefits for a country that produces those goods domestically. In the event of a war or crisis, the country may be forced to rebuild these industries from scratch.
Free trade divides economists and the general public. Research suggests that economists in the U.S. support free-trade policies at significantly higher rates than the general public.
In fact, the American economist Milton Friedman said: “The economics profession has been almost unanimous on the subject of the desirability of free trade.”
Free-trade policies have not been as popular with the general public. The key issues include unfair competition from countries where lower labor costs allow price-cutting and a loss of good-paying jobs to manufacturers abroad.
The call on the public to "Buy American" may get louder or quieter with the political winds, but it never goes silent.
Not surprisingly, the financial markets see the other side of the coin. Free trade is an opportunity to open another part of the world to domestic producers.
Moreover, free trade is now an integral part of the financial system and the investing world. American investors now have access to most foreign financial markets and to a wider range of securities, currencies, and other financial products.
However, completely free trade in the financial markets is unlikely in our times. There are many supranational regulatory organizations for world financial markets, including the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the International Organization of Securities Commission (IOSCO), and the Committee on Capital Movements and Invisible Transactions.
The European Union is a notable example of free trade today. The member nations form an essentially borderless single entity for the purposes of trade, and the adoption of the euro by most of those nations smooths the way further.
It should be noted that this system is regulated by a central bureaucracy that must manage the many trade-related issues that come up between representatives of member nations.
The United States currently has a number of free trade agreements in place. These include multi-nation agreements such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which covers Canada and Mexico, and the Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), which includes Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. There are also separate trade agreements with nations from Australia to Peru.
Collectively, these agreements mean that about half of all industrial goods entering the U.S. come in free of tariffs, according to government figures. The average import tariff on industrial goods is 2%.
All these agreements collectively still do not add up to free trade in its most laissez-faire form. American special interest groups have successfully lobbied to impose trade restrictions on hundreds of imports including steel, sugar, automobiles, milk, tuna, beef, and denim.
Starting in 2013, China began establishing free trade zones around key ports and coastal areas. These were areas where national regulations were relaxed in order to facilitate foreign investment and business development.
A free trade area is a group of countries that have agreed to mutually lower or eliminate trade barriers for trade within the area. This allows participating countries to benefit from reduced tariffs while maintaining their existing protections for trade with countries outside of the area.
Opponents often assert that free trade invites foreign competition with domestic industries, causing job loss and harming key industries. In some cases, free trade causes manufacturers to move their operations to countries with fewer regulations, rewarding companies that cause pollution or use abusive labor practices. In other cases, countries with weak intellectual property laws may steal technology from foreign companies.
Free trade refers to policies that permit inexpensive imports and exports, without tariffs or other trade barriers. In a free trade agreement, a group of countries agrees to lower their tariffs or other barriers to facilitate more exchanges with their trading partners. This allows all countries to benefit from lower prices and access to one another's resources.
Article SourcesThe offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Related TermsA duty can refer to either a form of taxation that is imposed on imported goods or the responsibilities that are held by an individual such as a CEO.
501(c) is a designation under the United States Internal Revenue Code that confers tax-exempt status on certain organizations, such as charities and other nonprofits.
A fiscal imbalance is a situation that occurs when future income streams for government units don't balance the future debt and spending obligations.
The federal budget is an itemized plan for the annual public expenditures of the United States.The Works Progress Administration (WPA) was a government program tasked with finding jobs for unemployed Americans from 1935 to 1943.
A structural adjustment is a set of economic policy reforms that a country must adopt in order to receive a loan from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, or both.
Related Articles Duty Tax on Imports and Exports: Meaning and Examples Regressive vs. Proportional vs. Progressive Taxes: What's the Difference? 501(c) Organization: What They Are, Types, and Examples What Are Examples of Pork Barrel Politics in the United States? Fiscal Imbalance: Definition, Types, and Example Federal Budget: What It Is, How It Works, History Partner LinksWe and our 100 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate interest is used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.
Store and/or access information on a device. Use limited data to select advertising. Create profiles for personalised advertising. Use profiles to select personalised advertising. Create profiles to personalise content. Use profiles to select personalised content. Measure advertising performance. Measure content performance. Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources. Develop and improve services. Use limited data to select content. List of Partners (vendors)